American Catholic Truth Society

Always be prepared to give an answer.
1 Peter 3:15

On ACTS
  Why Catholic?
  Response Articles
  Other Articles
  Debates
  Documentation
  History of ACTS
 
Ancient Papacy
Homepage
Q & A Box
 
A Lumen Gentleman
www.lumengentleman.com
Protestantism
 
 
Catholic Answers Tracts
Saint Worship?
  Mary: Ever Virgin
Mary: Full of Grace
Mary: Mother of God
This Rock Magazine
 
Catholic Apologetics International
Works of the Law
  Purgatory (v. J.White)
Heos Hou
Internet Bible Study
 
Patrick Madrid
Envoy Magazine
 
Dave Armstrong
Biblical Evidence for Catholicism
 
Mike and Sharon Mollerus
C.I.N.
(Where ACTS first went worldwide!)
 
Steve Ray
Catholic-Convert.com
 
Catholic Answers
Homepage
Jimmy Akin - James White
Debate CD
 
Dave Brown
Pope St. Leo Homepage
 
Mother Angelica
EWTN Homepage
Online Live Audio/Video
Document Library
 
John Salza
Scriptural Catholic Website
 
Katoliko Website
Katoliko
SCB Church
Apologetics Papers
 
Lisa's Lighthouse


Apologetics Books
on Amazon.com


Donate to ACTS!

 

 

 

Your Catholic Apologetics Portal
 

More from White on the subject of Sola Scriptura...

(qtd. on: http://www.bringyou.to/apolonio/Real.htm)

Gerry Matatics vs. James White, clip from "Great Debate 2" 1997

Matatics: Did the people in Jesus' day practice sola scriptura? The hearers of our Lord, Yes or No, Mr. White.

White: I have said over, and over, and over again, that sola scriptura --

M: It's a Yes or No.

W: -- is a doctrine that speaks to the normative condition of the church, not to times of enscripturation.

M: So your answer is No?

W: That is exactly what my answer is.

M: Thank you.

W: It is no.

M: Did the apostles practice sola scriptura, Mr. White? Yes or No?

W: No.

M: Thank you

White's "response" to this is:

...he's the one who took 15 seconds from a cross examination with Gerry Matatics on sola scriptura where Matatics asked if the Apostles practiced sola scriptura and I answered they did not (sola scriptura to the normative condition of the church, not to times of enscripturation, of course), and touts this as my "admission" that sola scriptura is not true, etc. I suppose I could ask a Roman Catholic opponent someday if Peter functioned as the Pope during Christ's ministry, and when he said, "Well, no, of course not" I could cut him off, make a clip, and tout it as an admission that Peter wasn't the Pope, but that kind of argumentation is only effective upon those who are not interested in the truth to begin with. I'll leave that kind of trite stuff for the political realm, where truth is irrelevant, and all that matters is what works.
The point is, sola scriptura has not always been the norm for the Church, in fact, it NEVER has been for the Church. Further, though White whines about the shortness of what is quoted from that debate with Matatics, he doesn't provide us with more context here! Would more context help his case, or further Apolonio's? For the sake of rebuttal (fair use) I include the following link to the audio of that entire cross examination of James White by Gerry Matatics:
Great Debate 2, Cross Examination of James White by Gerry Matatics
I assert that not only is what Apolonio said furthered, but White's claims on this topic are utterly destroyed by Mr. Matatics. White introduces a straw man in his imaginary question to an unnamed Roman Catholic opponent regarding whether or not St. Peter functioned as the Pope during Christ's ministry. Mr. Matatics questions were not imaginary, nor does the context of his questions detract from the snippet which Apolonio quotes (above). What I do find a bit interesting, even in this straw man, is that White has implied that it is a "truth" that Peter was indeed Pope - and that if he were to make this sort of edit it would "only be effective upon those who are not interested in the truth to begin with." That's a bit of a diversion from THIS topic, but it is interesting to make note of. Back to the subject at hand... I reiterate, though White has attempted (his usual) distraction and character assassination tactics on Apolonio - when we look (or listen) to the actual context of what Apolonio quoted - we find that Apolonio's quote is furthered - while White's tactics here are completely invalid.


More Sources on Sola Scriptura