Is Atheism True?
Dr. Brent Maundy
Mikes Statement : Second, the definition of omnipotence I provided in the OS was "Unmodified classical theism says god's omnipotence means god is capable of doing anything that is logically possible."
Again, Brent did not voice in his rebuttal any disagreement with that
definition, so it is rational for me to proceed under the assumption
that Maundy agrees with me that omnipotence is the ABILITY to do
anything that is logically possible."
response: Mike has an uncanning ability to confuse things. I do not
agree with Mike that "omnipotence is the ABILITY to do anything that is
logically possible." I rebut that in 4 ways:
Rebuttal 1) Logic is reason conducted or assessed according to strict
principles of validity that men define. God is not bound by man's finite
logic simply because God created all things including the ability of
man to reason. Therefore God has no reason to limit himself to his
creation abilities. That is absurd. His omnipotence still stands.
Rebuttal 2) If Mikes statement is true then I can claim that it is
"logically possible" for me to steal food at the local grocery because I
am hungry and I have the ability (no relatives will feed me) and I need
to feed my family because I'm poor. While that is a logical statement
it does not make me omnipotent nor is it morally right, even though the
logical consequence of being hungry is to seek food to survive.
Rebuttal 3) Logic is only as good as to the principles that it is
applied too. I reiterate that God is outside of space and time, being
the creator of them both. Whether God chooses to do something or not do,
it is at his discretion, not ours. Regardless if we think it is logical
or not as well.
Brent Rebuttal 4) As Mike has
so nicely provided, parts of scripture show that God can and does change
his mind but at other times he carries out his will. That has nothing
to do with the ability to do anything that is logically possible.
Mike Objection: God can do all things as in Job 42:2 and Matthew 19:26, which contradicts Mike statement that Brent claims that God has no need to change his plan or change his mind.
reply: I never stated that God cannot changed his mind or has not in
the past. Mike is trying to twist things to his detriment and he clasps
at straws. I merely stated and I quote myself "Therefore he God would
have no need to change Jesus arrival date because God will shall always
be done and was done in 0 AD. " In no way does that indicate that God
never changes his mind and in fact we know he did not change his mind in
the case of Jesus birth because Jesus was born in 0 AD. God did change
his mind in Matthew 19:26
and other places but Mike ignores the fact that God knew he would
change his mind because he foresaw it, being outside of space and time.
Again I repeat that God being outside of space and time knows our
hearts, wills and what we can and do choose. That in no way indicates
that God has mutually contradictory properties.
I remind the reader Mikes defense of athesism was originally premised on
who is omniscient and omnipotent (God of unmodified classical theism)
possesses mutually contradictory properties. Why because assuming God
knew he would impregnate Mary in 0 AD, God does not have the power to
delay impregnating Mary in 1 AD. Therefore God who is incapable of
failing must be false and atheism (positive) must be true."
Summary: Mike an unbeliever cites numerous scriptures yet never once
has Mike shown that atheism is true and God has mutually contradictory
properties. Mikes original example of using Mary remains a poor example
and does not prove atheism is true as I have rebut it.
Copyright © 2014, American Catholic Truth Society, Scott Windsor
This message originated in the CatholicDebateForum on Yahoogroups.
All rights reserved on messages posted to this forum, however
permission is granted to copy messages to other forums, providing
this footer remains attached to the message.
To visit this group on the web, go to: